Adguard Home Sync vs mitmproxy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAdguard Home Syncmitmproxy
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicensefreeMIT
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, one-clickdocker, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 1,762★ 44,605
First released20232010
ReplacesCharles Proxy, Fiddler

Why pick each one

Choose Adguard Home Sync if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
Adguard Home Sync details

Choose mitmproxy if…

  • Powerful for debugging
  • Highly scriptable
mitmproxy details

Frequently asked questions

Is Adguard Home Sync or mitmproxy better?

Neither is universally better. mitmproxy has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Adguard Home Sync and mitmproxy free and open-source?

Yes. Adguard Home Sync is licensed under free and mitmproxy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Adguard Home Sync and mitmproxy with Docker?

Adguard Home Sync: yes. mitmproxy: yes.

Related comparisons