Caddy vs mitmproxy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCaddymitmproxy
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metaldocker, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 74,748★ 44,605
First released20152010
ReplacesNginx, ApacheCharles Proxy, Fiddler

Why pick each one

Choose Caddy if…

  • Zero-config TLS
  • Easy to learn
Caddy details

Choose mitmproxy if…

  • Powerful for debugging
  • Highly scriptable
mitmproxy details

Frequently asked questions

Is Caddy or mitmproxy better?

Neither is universally better. Caddy has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Caddy and mitmproxy free and open-source?

Yes. Caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and mitmproxy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Caddy and mitmproxy with Docker?

Caddy: yes. mitmproxy: yes.

Related comparisons