acme.sh vs Caddy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featureacme.shCaddy
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageShellGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM32 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 47,426★ 74,748
First released20162015
ReplacesCertbotNginx, Apache

Why pick each one

Choose acme.sh if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 47.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Shell
acme.sh details

Choose Caddy if…

  • Zero-config TLS
  • Easy to learn
Caddy details

Frequently asked questions

Is acme.sh or Caddy better?

Neither is universally better. Caddy has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are acme.sh and Caddy free and open-source?

Yes. acme.sh is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Caddy under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run acme.sh and Caddy with Docker?

acme.sh: check the project docs for container support. Caddy: yes.

Related comparisons