acme.sh vs AdGuard Home

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featureacme.shAdGuard Home
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageShellTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM32 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 47,426★ 35,977
First released20162018
ReplacesCertbotPi-hole, NextDNS

Why pick each one

Choose acme.sh if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 47.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Shell
acme.sh details

Choose AdGuard Home if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 36k GitHub stars
AdGuard Home details

Frequently asked questions

Is acme.sh or AdGuard Home better?

Neither is universally better. acme.sh has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are acme.sh and AdGuard Home free and open-source?

Yes. acme.sh is licensed under GPL-3.0 and AdGuard Home under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run acme.sh and AdGuard Home with Docker?

acme.sh: check the project docs for container support. AdGuard Home: yes.

Related comparisons