AdGuard Home vs mitmproxy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAdGuard Homemitmproxy
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 35,977★ 44,605
First released20182010
ReplacesPi-hole, NextDNSCharles Proxy, Fiddler

Why pick each one

Choose AdGuard Home if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 36k GitHub stars
AdGuard Home details

Choose mitmproxy if…

  • Powerful for debugging
  • Highly scriptable
mitmproxy details

Frequently asked questions

Is AdGuard Home or mitmproxy better?

Neither is universally better. mitmproxy has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are AdGuard Home and mitmproxy free and open-source?

Yes. AdGuard Home is licensed under GPL-3.0 and mitmproxy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run AdGuard Home and mitmproxy with Docker?

AdGuard Home: yes. mitmproxy: yes.

Related comparisons