acme.sh vs mitmproxy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featureacme.shmitmproxy
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageShellPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM32 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 47,426★ 44,605
First released20162010
ReplacesCertbotCharles Proxy, Fiddler

Why pick each one

Choose acme.sh if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 47.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Shell
acme.sh details

Choose mitmproxy if…

  • Powerful for debugging
  • Highly scriptable
mitmproxy details

Frequently asked questions

Is acme.sh or mitmproxy better?

Neither is universally better. acme.sh has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are acme.sh and mitmproxy free and open-source?

Yes. acme.sh is licensed under GPL-3.0 and mitmproxy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run acme.sh and mitmproxy with Docker?

acme.sh: check the project docs for container support. mitmproxy: yes.

Related comparisons