Anubis vs mitmproxy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Anubis
Proof-of-work proxy to block AI scraper bots
VS
mitmproxy
Interactive HTTPS proxy for inspection and debugging
| Feature | Anubis | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 21,230 | ★ 44,605 |
| First released | 2025 | 2010 |
| Replaces | Cloudflare Bot Management | Charles Proxy, Fiddler |
Why pick each one
Choose Anubis if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 21.2k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Anubis or mitmproxy better?
Neither is universally better. mitmproxy has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Anubis and mitmproxy free and open-source?
Yes. Anubis is licensed under MIT and mitmproxy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Anubis and mitmproxy with Docker?
Anubis: yes. mitmproxy: yes.