Authelia vs mitmproxy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAutheliamitmproxy
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 28,514★ 44,605
First released20172010
ReplacesOkta, Cloudflare AccessCharles Proxy, Fiddler

Why pick each one

Choose Authelia if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 28.5k GitHub stars
Authelia details

Choose mitmproxy if…

  • Powerful for debugging
  • Highly scriptable
mitmproxy details

Frequently asked questions

Is Authelia or mitmproxy better?

mitmproxy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Authelia if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Authelia and mitmproxy free and open-source?

Yes. Authelia is licensed under Apache-2.0 and mitmproxy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Authelia and mitmproxy with Docker?

Authelia: yes. mitmproxy: yes.

Related comparisons