Concrete CMS vs Publii
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Concrete CMS
In-context editing CMS for marketers and site owners
VS
Publii
Desktop CMS for building static blogs and sites
| Feature | Concrete CMS | Publii |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | HTML |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 850 | ★ 7,282 |
| First released | 2008 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Wix, Squarespace | WordPress, Squarespace |
Why pick each one
Choose Concrete CMS if…
- Very approachable for non-technical editors
- No separate admin needed for content
Frequently asked questions
Is Concrete CMS or Publii better?
Neither is universally better. Publii has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Concrete CMS and Publii free and open-source?
Yes. Concrete CMS is licensed under MIT and Publii under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Concrete CMS and Publii with Docker?
Concrete CMS: yes. Publii: check the project docs for container support.