Comentario vs Chatwoot

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureComentarioChatwoot
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageGoRuby
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, sourcedocker, kubernetes, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 700★ 35,596
First released20232019
ReplacesDisqusIntercom, Zendesk, Drift

Why pick each one

Choose Comentario if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
Comentario details

Choose Chatwoot if…

  • Polished customer support workflow
  • Active development
Chatwoot details

Frequently asked questions

Is Comentario or Chatwoot better?

Neither is universally better. Chatwoot has the larger community, while Comentario is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Comentario and Chatwoot free and open-source?

Yes. Comentario is licensed under MIT and Chatwoot under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Comentario and Chatwoot with Docker?

Comentario: yes. Chatwoot: yes.

Related comparisons