Centrifugo vs Comentario
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Centrifugo
Scalable real-time messaging server for apps and websites
VS
Comentario
Privacy-friendly, self-hosted web comments engine
| Feature | Centrifugo | Comentario |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,590 | ★ 700 |
| First released | 2015 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Pusher, Firebase Realtime Database | Disqus |
Why pick each one
Choose Comentario if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Centrifugo or Comentario better?
Neither is universally better. Centrifugo has the larger community, while Comentario is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Centrifugo and Comentario free and open-source?
Yes. Centrifugo is licensed under MIT and Comentario under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Centrifugo and Comentario with Docker?
Centrifugo: yes. Comentario: yes.