Berty vs Comentario
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Berty
Peer-to-peer messaging app that works offline
VS
Comentario
Privacy-friendly, self-hosted web comments engine
| Feature | Berty | Comentario |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,268 | ★ 700 |
| First released | 2018 | 2023 |
| Replaces | WhatsApp, Signal | Disqus |
Why pick each one
Choose Berty if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Mature project with 9.3k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Comentario if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Berty or Comentario better?
Neither is universally better. Berty has the larger community, while Comentario is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Berty and Comentario free and open-source?
Yes. Berty is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Comentario under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Berty and Comentario with Docker?
Berty: check the project docs for container support. Comentario: yes.