Anope vs Berty
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Anope
IRC services suite for nickname and channel registration
VS
Berty
Peer-to-peer messaging app that works offline
| Feature | Anope | Berty |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C++ | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 363 | ★ 9,268 |
| First released | 2003 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Slack | WhatsApp, Signal |
Why pick each one
Choose Anope if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Written in C++
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose Berty if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Mature project with 9.3k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Anope or Berty better?
Neither is universally better. Berty has the larger community, while Anope is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Anope and Berty free and open-source?
Yes. Anope is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Berty under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Anope and Berty with Docker?
Anope: check the project docs for container support. Berty: check the project docs for container support.