Anope vs Etherpad
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Anope
IRC services suite for nickname and channel registration
VS
Etherpad
Real-time collaborative document editor
| Feature | Anope | Etherpad |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C++ | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 363 | ★ 18,481 |
| First released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Replaces | Slack | Google Docs |
Why pick each one
Choose Anope if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Written in C++
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Anope or Etherpad better?
Neither is universally better. Etherpad has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Anope and Etherpad free and open-source?
Yes. Anope is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Etherpad under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Anope and Etherpad with Docker?
Anope: check the project docs for container support. Etherpad: yes.