Etherpad vs Chatwoot

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEtherpadChatwoot
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptRuby
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, kubernetes, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 18,481★ 35,596
First released20112019
ReplacesGoogle DocsIntercom, Zendesk, Drift

Why pick each one

Choose Etherpad if…

  • Very mature and stable
  • Highly extensible
Etherpad details

Choose Chatwoot if…

  • Polished customer support workflow
  • Active development
Chatwoot details

Frequently asked questions

Is Etherpad or Chatwoot better?

Neither is universally better. Chatwoot has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Etherpad and Chatwoot free and open-source?

Yes. Etherpad is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Chatwoot under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Etherpad and Chatwoot with Docker?

Etherpad: yes. Chatwoot: yes.

Related comparisons