baibot vs Berty

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturebaibotBerty
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageRustTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcebare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 238★ 9,268
First released20242018
ReplacesSlack AI assistantsWhatsApp, Signal

Why pick each one

Choose baibot if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
baibot details

Choose Berty if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Mature project with 9.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Berty details

Frequently asked questions

Is baibot or Berty better?

Neither is universally better. Berty has the larger community, while baibot is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are baibot and Berty free and open-source?

Yes. baibot is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Berty under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run baibot and Berty with Docker?

baibot: yes. Berty: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons