Cactus Comments vs Chatwoot

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCactus CommentsChatwoot
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageElixirRuby
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker, kubernetes, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 200★ 35,596
First released20202019
ReplacesDisqusIntercom, Zendesk, Drift

Why pick each one

Choose Cactus Comments if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Elixir
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Cactus Comments details

Choose Chatwoot if…

  • Polished customer support workflow
  • Active development
Chatwoot details

Frequently asked questions

Is Cactus Comments or Chatwoot better?

Neither is universally better. Chatwoot has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Cactus Comments and Chatwoot free and open-source?

Yes. Cactus Comments is licensed under MIT and Chatwoot under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Cactus Comments and Chatwoot with Docker?

Cactus Comments: yes. Chatwoot: yes.

Related comparisons