Cloudreve vs gallery-dl
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cloudreve
File management and sharing system, supports multiple storage
VS
gallery-dl
Command-line tool to download image galleries from websites
| Feature | Cloudreve | gallery-dl |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | Photo Management |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,485 | ★ 19,143 |
| First released | 2026 | 2015 |
| Replaces | — | Manual downloads |
Why pick each one
Choose Cloudreve if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 28.5k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Cloudreve or gallery-dl better?
Neither is universally better. Cloudreve has the larger community, while gallery-dl is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Cloudreve and gallery-dl free and open-source?
Yes. Cloudreve is licensed under GPL-3.0 and gallery-dl under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cloudreve and gallery-dl with Docker?
Cloudreve: yes. gallery-dl: check the project docs for container support.