bitmagnet vs Cloudreve
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
bitmagnet
BitTorrent indexer, DHT crawler, content classifier and torrent search
VS
Cloudreve
File management and sharing system, supports multiple storage
| Feature | bitmagnet | Cloudreve |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,265 | ★ 28,485 |
| First released | 2026 | 2026 |
| Replaces | — | — |
Why pick each one
Choose bitmagnet if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Choose Cloudreve if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 28.5k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is bitmagnet or Cloudreve better?
Neither is universally better. Cloudreve has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are bitmagnet and Cloudreve free and open-source?
Yes. bitmagnet is licensed under MIT and Cloudreve under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run bitmagnet and Cloudreve with Docker?
bitmagnet: yes. Cloudreve: yes.