Backrest vs Cloudreve

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBackrestCloudreve
CategoryBackup & RecoveryFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 7,071★ 28,485
First released20242026
ReplacesBackblaze

Why pick each one

Choose Backrest if…

  • Makes Restic approachable
  • Good scheduling
  • Lightweight
Backrest details

Choose Cloudreve if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 28.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
Cloudreve details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backrest or Cloudreve better?

Neither is universally better. Cloudreve has the larger community, while Backrest is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Backrest and Cloudreve free and open-source?

Yes. Backrest is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Cloudreve under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backrest and Cloudreve with Docker?

Backrest: yes. Cloudreve: yes.

Related comparisons