copyparty vs gallery-dl

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurecopypartygallery-dl
CategoryFile Sync & StoragePhoto Management
LicenseMITGPL-2.0
LanguagePythonPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybare-metal, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 46,121★ 19,143
First released20192015
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveManual downloads

Why pick each one

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Choose gallery-dl if…

  • Supports hundreds of sites
  • Very actively maintained
gallery-dl details

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or gallery-dl better?

Neither is universally better. copyparty has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are copyparty and gallery-dl free and open-source?

Yes. copyparty is licensed under MIT and gallery-dl under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run copyparty and gallery-dl with Docker?

copyparty: yes. gallery-dl: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons