Apaxy vs copyparty

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureApaxycopyparty
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageShellPython
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 1,924★ 46,121
First released20202019
ReplacesDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose Apaxy if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Shell
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Apaxy details

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Frequently asked questions

Is Apaxy or copyparty better?

copyparty is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Apaxy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Apaxy and copyparty free and open-source?

Yes. Apaxy is licensed under GPL-3.0 and copyparty under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Apaxy and copyparty with Docker?

Apaxy: check the project docs for container support. copyparty: yes.

Related comparisons