copyparty vs MinIO

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecopypartyMinIO
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 46,121★ 61,387
First released20192015
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Choose MinIO if…

  • Excellent performance
  • Drop-in S3 replacement
  • Scales horizontally
MinIO details

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or MinIO better?

Neither is universally better. MinIO has the larger community, while copyparty is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are copyparty and MinIO free and open-source?

Yes. copyparty is licensed under MIT and MinIO under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run copyparty and MinIO with Docker?

copyparty: yes. MinIO: yes.

Related comparisons