bup vs copyparty

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurebupcopyparty
CategoryBackup & RecoveryFile Sync & Storage
LicenseLGPL-2.1MIT
LanguagePythonPython
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM128 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 7,337★ 46,121
First released20102019
ReplacesTime MachineDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose bup if…

  • Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
  • Mature project with 7.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
bup details

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Frequently asked questions

Is bup or copyparty better?

copyparty is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider bup if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are bup and copyparty free and open-source?

Yes. bup is licensed under LGPL-2.1 and copyparty under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run bup and copyparty with Docker?

bup: check the project docs for container support. copyparty: yes.

Related comparisons