Backrest vs bup

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBackrestbup
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0LGPL-2.1
LanguageTypeScriptPython
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary
GitHub stars★ 7,071★ 7,337
First released20242010
ReplacesBackblazeTime Machine

Why pick each one

Choose Backrest if…

  • Makes Restic approachable
  • Good scheduling
  • Lightweight
Backrest details

Choose bup if…

  • Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
  • Mature project with 7.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
bup details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backrest or bup better?

Neither is universally better. bup has the larger community, while Backrest is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Backrest and bup free and open-source?

Yes. Backrest is licensed under GPL-3.0 and bup under LGPL-2.1. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backrest and bup with Docker?

Backrest: yes. bup: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons