Chibisafe vs copyparty

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureChibisafecopyparty
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptPython
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB64 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 2,748★ 46,121
First released20192019
ReplacesImgur, DropboxDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose Chibisafe if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.7k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Chibisafe details

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Frequently asked questions

Is Chibisafe or copyparty better?

copyparty is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Chibisafe if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Chibisafe and copyparty free and open-source?

Yes. Chibisafe is licensed under MIT and copyparty under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Chibisafe and copyparty with Docker?

Chibisafe: yes. copyparty: yes.

Related comparisons