copyparty vs Jirafeau

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecopypartyJirafeau
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0-only
LanguagePython
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB50 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 46,121
First released20192023
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveImageShack, Imgur

Why pick each one

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Choose Jirafeau if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0-only license
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Jirafeau details

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or Jirafeau better?

copyparty is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Jirafeau if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are copyparty and Jirafeau free and open-source?

Yes. copyparty is licensed under MIT and Jirafeau under AGPL-3.0-only. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run copyparty and Jirafeau with Docker?

copyparty: yes. Jirafeau: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons