CKAN vs Backup tool nono Plakar
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CKAN
Make open data websites
VS
Backup tool nono Plakar
Effortless backup with built-in verification and UI
| Feature | CKAN | Backup tool nono Plakar |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | ISC |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,088 | ★ 2,013 |
| First released | 2026 | 2021 |
| Replaces | — | Backblaze, CrashPlan |
Why pick each one
Choose CKAN if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…
- Released under the ISC license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is CKAN or Backup tool nono Plakar better?
Neither is universally better. CKAN has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are CKAN and Backup tool nono Plakar free and open-source?
Yes. CKAN is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Backup tool nono Plakar under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CKAN and Backup tool nono Plakar with Docker?
CKAN: check the project docs for container support. Backup tool nono Plakar: yes.