Ceph vs Tracim

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCephTracim
CategoryFile Sync & StorageOffice Suites
LicenseLGPL-2.1AGPL-3.0-or-later,LGPL-3.0-or-later,CC-BY-SA-2.5,MIT
LanguageC++Python
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM4,096 MB50 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, bare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 16,905★ 274
First released20062023
ReplacesAmazon S3, Google DriveDropbox, Google Drive, Slack

Why pick each one

Choose Ceph if…

  • Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 16.9k GitHub stars
Ceph details

Choose Tracim if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later,LGPL-3.0-or-later,CC-BY-SA-2.5,MIT license
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Tracim details

Frequently asked questions

Is Ceph or Tracim better?

Neither is universally better. Ceph has the larger community, while Tracim is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Ceph and Tracim free and open-source?

Yes. Ceph is licensed under LGPL-2.1 and Tracim under AGPL-3.0-or-later,LGPL-3.0-or-later,CC-BY-SA-2.5,MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Ceph and Tracim with Docker?

Ceph: yes. Tracim: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons