FileBrowser Quantum vs Tracim
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FileBrowser Quantum
Enhanced web file manager fork with extra features
VS
Tracim
Collaborative platform intended for team collaboration
| Feature | FileBrowser Quantum | Tracim |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | Office Suites |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0-or-later,LGPL-3.0-or-later,CC-BY-SA-2.5,MIT |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,695 | ★ 274 |
| First released | 2024 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Google Drive, Dropbox | Dropbox, Google Drive, Slack |
Why pick each one
Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
Choose Tracim if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later,LGPL-3.0-or-later,CC-BY-SA-2.5,MIT license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is FileBrowser Quantum or Tracim better?
FileBrowser Quantum is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Tracim if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are FileBrowser Quantum and Tracim free and open-source?
Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Tracim under AGPL-3.0-or-later,LGPL-3.0-or-later,CC-BY-SA-2.5,MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and Tracim with Docker?
FileBrowser Quantum: yes. Tracim: check the project docs for container support.