CryptPad vs Tracim
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CryptPad
End-to-end encrypted collaboration suite
VS
Tracim
Collaborative platform intended for team collaboration
| Feature | CryptPad | Tracim |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | Office Suites |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0-or-later,LGPL-3.0-or-later,CC-BY-SA-2.5,MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,832 | ★ 274 |
| First released | 2015 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Google Drive, Microsoft 365 | Dropbox, Google Drive, Slack |
Why pick each one
Choose CryptPad if…
- Strong privacy guarantees
- Real-time collaboration
- No account needed to start
Choose Tracim if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later,LGPL-3.0-or-later,CC-BY-SA-2.5,MIT license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is CryptPad or Tracim better?
Neither is universally better. CryptPad has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are CryptPad and Tracim free and open-source?
Yes. CryptPad is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Tracim under AGPL-3.0-or-later,LGPL-3.0-or-later,CC-BY-SA-2.5,MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CryptPad and Tracim with Docker?
CryptPad: yes. Tracim: check the project docs for container support.