croc vs FileBrowser Quantum

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecrocFileBrowser Quantum
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM32 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 39,485★ 7,695
First released20182024
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDropGoogle Drive, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose croc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
croc details

Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
FileBrowser Quantum details

Frequently asked questions

Is croc or FileBrowser Quantum better?

Neither is universally better. croc has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are croc and FileBrowser Quantum free and open-source?

Yes. croc is licensed under MIT and FileBrowser Quantum under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run croc and FileBrowser Quantum with Docker?

croc: check the project docs for container support. FileBrowser Quantum: yes.

Related comparisons