SHSelfHostIndex

TYPO3 vs Wagtail

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
TY TYPO3 Enterprise CMS popular for large corporate websites VS WA Wagtail Developer-friendly Django CMS with a great editor experience
FeatureTYPO3Wagtail
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseGPL-2.0BSD-3-Clause
LanguagePHPPython
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 1,200★ 20,433
First released19982014
ReplacesAdobe Experience Manager, SitecoreAdobe Experience Manager, WordPress

Why pick each one

Choose TYPO3 if…

  • Built for large enterprise deployments
  • Reliable LTS release cycle
TYPO3 details

Choose Wagtail if…

  • Excellent editing experience
  • Great for Python developers
Wagtail details

Frequently asked questions

Is TYPO3 or Wagtail better?

Wagtail is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider TYPO3 if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are TYPO3 and Wagtail free and open-source?

Yes. TYPO3 is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Wagtail under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run TYPO3 and Wagtail with Docker?

TYPO3: yes. Wagtail: yes.

Related comparisons