SHSelfHostIndex

TimeTagger vs Gnomecast Timewarrior UI

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
TI TimeTagger Tag-based time tracker with an interactive timeline VS GN Gnomecast Timewarrior UI Graphical front-end for the Timewarrior CLI tracker
FeatureTimeTaggerGnomecast Timewarrior UI
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 1,769★ 70
First released20212020
ReplacesToggl, HarvestToggl Desktop, Clockify Desktop

Why pick each one

Choose TimeTagger if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
TimeTagger details

Choose Gnomecast Timewarrior UI if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Gnomecast Timewarrior UI details

Frequently asked questions

Is TimeTagger or Gnomecast Timewarrior UI better?

Neither is universally better. TimeTagger has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are TimeTagger and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI free and open-source?

Yes. TimeTagger is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run TimeTagger and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI with Docker?

TimeTagger: yes. Gnomecast Timewarrior UI: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons