SHSelfHostIndex

TimeTracker vs Gnomecast Timewarrior UI

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
TI TimeTracker Self-hosted web-based time tracking for teams VS GN Gnomecast Timewarrior UI Graphical front-end for the Timewarrior CLI tracker
FeatureTimeTrackerGnomecast Timewarrior UI
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseMITMIT
LanguagePythonPython
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 615★ 70
First released20242020
ReplacesToggl, HarvestToggl Desktop, Clockify Desktop

Why pick each one

Choose TimeTracker if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
TimeTracker details

Choose Gnomecast Timewarrior UI if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Gnomecast Timewarrior UI details

Frequently asked questions

Is TimeTracker or Gnomecast Timewarrior UI better?

Neither is universally better. TimeTracker has the larger community, while Gnomecast Timewarrior UI is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are TimeTracker and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI free and open-source?

Yes. TimeTracker is licensed under MIT and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run TimeTracker and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI with Docker?

TimeTracker: yes. Gnomecast Timewarrior UI: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons