Beaver Habit Tracker vs Gnomecast Timewarrior UI

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBeaver Habit TrackerGnomecast Timewarrior UI
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseMIT
LanguagePythonPython
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 1,812★ 70
First released20262020
ReplacesToggl Desktop, Clockify Desktop

Why pick each one

Choose Beaver Habit Tracker if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
Beaver Habit Tracker details

Choose Gnomecast Timewarrior UI if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Gnomecast Timewarrior UI details

Frequently asked questions

Is Beaver Habit Tracker or Gnomecast Timewarrior UI better?

Neither is universally better. Beaver Habit Tracker has the larger community, while Gnomecast Timewarrior UI is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Beaver Habit Tracker and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI free and open-source?

Yes. Beaver Habit Tracker is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Beaver Habit Tracker and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI with Docker?

Beaver Habit Tracker: yes. Gnomecast Timewarrior UI: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons