Beaver Habit Tracker vs TimeTracker
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Beaver Habit Tracker
Habit tracking app to save your precious moments in your fleeting life
VS
TimeTracker
Self-hosted web-based time tracking for teams
| Feature | Beaver Habit Tracker | TimeTracker |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,812 | ★ 615 |
| First released | 2026 | 2024 |
| Replaces | — | Toggl, Harvest |
Why pick each one
Choose Beaver Habit Tracker if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Choose TimeTracker if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Beaver Habit Tracker or TimeTracker better?
Neither is universally better. Beaver Habit Tracker has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Beaver Habit Tracker and TimeTracker free and open-source?
Yes. Beaver Habit Tracker is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and TimeTracker under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Beaver Habit Tracker and TimeTracker with Docker?
Beaver Habit Tracker: yes. TimeTracker: yes.