Beaver Habit Tracker vs gtimelog

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBeaver Habit Trackergtimelog
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseGPL-2.0
LanguagePythonPython
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdockerbare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 1,812★ 276
First released20262008
ReplacesToggl

Why pick each one

Choose Beaver Habit Tracker if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
Beaver Habit Tracker details

Choose gtimelog if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
gtimelog details

Frequently asked questions

Is Beaver Habit Tracker or gtimelog better?

Neither is universally better. Beaver Habit Tracker has the larger community, while gtimelog is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Beaver Habit Tracker and gtimelog free and open-source?

Yes. Beaver Habit Tracker is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and gtimelog under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Beaver Habit Tracker and gtimelog with Docker?

Beaver Habit Tracker: yes. gtimelog: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons