Beaver Habit Tracker vs TimeTagger

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBeaver Habit TrackerTimeTagger
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonPython
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, source
GitHub stars★ 1,812★ 1,769
First released20262021
ReplacesToggl, Harvest

Why pick each one

Choose Beaver Habit Tracker if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
Beaver Habit Tracker details

Choose TimeTagger if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
TimeTagger details

Frequently asked questions

Is Beaver Habit Tracker or TimeTagger better?

Neither is universally better. Beaver Habit Tracker has the larger community, while TimeTagger is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Beaver Habit Tracker and TimeTagger free and open-source?

Yes. Beaver Habit Tracker is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and TimeTagger under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Beaver Habit Tracker and TimeTagger with Docker?

Beaver Habit Tracker: yes. TimeTagger: yes.

Related comparisons