Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare vs WebDAV Server Go

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureResilio Sync alternative OnionshareWebDAV Server Go
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinary, bare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 7,055★ 5,750
First released20142017
ReplacesWeTransfer, DropboxDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 7.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare details

Choose WebDAV Server Go if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 5.8k GitHub stars
WebDAV Server Go details

Frequently asked questions

Is Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare or WebDAV Server Go better?

Neither is universally better. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare has the larger community, while WebDAV Server Go is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare and WebDAV Server Go free and open-source?

Yes. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare is licensed under GPL-3.0 and WebDAV Server Go under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare and WebDAV Server Go with Docker?

Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare: check the project docs for container support. WebDAV Server Go: yes.

Related comparisons