SHSelfHostIndex

Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare vs WebDAV Server Go

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
RE Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare Anonymous file sharing over the Tor network VS WE WebDAV Server Go Lightweight standalone WebDAV file server
FeatureResilio Sync alternative OnionshareWebDAV Server Go
Deploy effortRead-the-docs projectUnder-an-hour setup
Health score91 · Excellent90 · Excellent
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinary, bare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 7,098★ 5,877
First released20142017
ReplacesWeTransfer, DropboxDropbox

What are Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare and WebDAV Server Go?

Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare

OnionShare is an open-source tool that lets you securely and anonymously share files using the Tor network. It can also host websites and run a chat server accessible only as a Tor onion service.

  • Anonymous sharing over Tor
  • No central server needed
  • Host sites and chat anonymously

WebDAV Server Go

A lightweight standalone WebDAV server that exposes a directory tree for syncing with WebDAV-capable clients. It is useful as a minimal sync backend for many file managers and apps.

  • Standalone WebDAV
  • Per-user permissions
  • Minimal backend
  • Cross-platform clients

Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare vs WebDAV Server Go: key differences

Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare is written in Python, while WebDAV Server Go is built with Go. Licensing differs — GPL-3.0 for Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare versus MIT for WebDAV Server Go. WebDAV Server Go is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare is the more established project (first released 2014), while WebDAV Server Go arrived in 2017. WebDAV Server Go lists first-class Docker deployment; Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare does not.

Why pick each one

Choose Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 7.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare details

Choose WebDAV Server Go if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 5.9k GitHub stars
WebDAV Server Go details

Frequently asked questions

Is Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare or WebDAV Server Go better?

Neither is universally better. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare has the larger community, while WebDAV Server Go is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare and WebDAV Server Go free and open-source?

Yes. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare is licensed under GPL-3.0 and WebDAV Server Go under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare and WebDAV Server Go with Docker?

Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare: check the project docs for container support. WebDAV Server Go: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare or WebDAV Server Go?

WebDAV Server Go has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons