Stork vs ZincSearch
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Stork
Fast, accessible static site search in WebAssembly
VS
ZincSearch
Lightweight search engine alternative to Elasticsearch
| Feature | Stork | ZincSearch |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,758 | ★ 17,884 |
| First released | 2019 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Algolia | Elasticsearch, Algolia |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Stork or ZincSearch better?
Neither is universally better. ZincSearch has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Stork and ZincSearch free and open-source?
Yes. Stork is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ZincSearch under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Stork and ZincSearch with Docker?
Stork: check the project docs for container support. ZincSearch: yes.