Sonic vs Stork
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Sonic
Fast, lightweight schema-less search backend
VS
Stork
Fast, accessible static site search in WebAssembly
| Feature | Sonic | Stork |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 21,299 | ★ 2,758 |
| First released | 2019 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Algolia, Elasticsearch | Algolia |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Sonic or Stork better?
Neither is universally better. Sonic has the larger community, while Stork is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Sonic and Stork free and open-source?
Yes. Sonic is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Stork under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Sonic and Stork with Docker?
Sonic: yes. Stork: check the project docs for container support.