SHSelfHostIndex

Titra vs Gnomecast Timewarrior UI

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
TI Titra Fast time tracking for freelancers and small teams VS GN Gnomecast Timewarrior UI Graphical front-end for the Timewarrior CLI tracker
FeatureTitraGnomecast Timewarrior UI
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageJavaScriptPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 496★ 70
First released20192020
ReplacesToggl, Harvest, ClockifyToggl Desktop, Clockify Desktop

Why pick each one

Choose Titra if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in JavaScript
Titra details

Choose Gnomecast Timewarrior UI if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Gnomecast Timewarrior UI details

Frequently asked questions

Is Titra or Gnomecast Timewarrior UI better?

Neither is universally better. Titra has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Titra and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI free and open-source?

Yes. Titra is licensed under MIT and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Titra and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI with Docker?

Titra: yes. Gnomecast Timewarrior UI: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons