Beaver Habit Tracker vs Titra
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Beaver Habit Tracker
Habit tracking app to save your precious moments in your fleeting life
VS
Titra
Fast time tracking for freelancers and small teams
| Feature | Beaver Habit Tracker | Titra |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,812 | ★ 496 |
| First released | 2026 | 2019 |
| Replaces | — | Toggl, Harvest, Clockify |
Why pick each one
Choose Beaver Habit Tracker if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Choose Titra if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Beaver Habit Tracker or Titra better?
Neither is universally better. Beaver Habit Tracker has the larger community, while Titra is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Beaver Habit Tracker and Titra free and open-source?
Yes. Beaver Habit Tracker is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Titra under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Beaver Habit Tracker and Titra with Docker?
Beaver Habit Tracker: yes. Titra: yes.