Titra vs TimeCase
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Titra
Fast time tracking for freelancers and small teams
VS
TimeCase
Free self-hosted time tracking web application
| Feature | Titra | TimeCase |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 496 | ★ 21 |
| First released | 2019 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Toggl, Harvest, Clockify | Clockify, Toggl |
Why pick each one
Choose Titra if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
Choose TimeCase if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Titra or TimeCase better?
Titra is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider TimeCase if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Titra and TimeCase free and open-source?
Yes. Titra is licensed under MIT and TimeCase under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Titra and TimeCase with Docker?
Titra: yes. TimeCase: yes.