osmos::feed vs RSSBox
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
osmos::feed
Build an RSS reader as a static site with GitHub Actions
VS
RSSBox
Generate RSS feeds for sites without native feeds
| Feature | osmos::feed | RSSBox |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 991 | ★ 814 |
| First released | 2021 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Feedly | RSS-Bridge |
Why pick each one
Choose osmos::feed if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
Choose RSSBox if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Ruby
Frequently asked questions
Is osmos::feed or RSSBox better?
Neither is universally better. osmos::feed has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are osmos::feed and RSSBox free and open-source?
Yes. osmos::feed is licensed under MIT and RSSBox under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run osmos::feed and RSSBox with Docker?
osmos::feed: check the project docs for container support. RSSBox: yes.