FreshRSS vs osmos::feed
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FreshRSS
Free, self-hostable RSS feed aggregator
VS
osmos::feed
Build an RSS reader as a static site with GitHub Actions
| Feature | FreshRSS | osmos::feed |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,716 | ★ 991 |
| First released | 2013 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Inoreader, Google Reader | Feedly |
Why pick each one
Choose FreshRSS if…
- Lightweight and fast
- Works with many mobile apps
- Actively maintained
Choose osmos::feed if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is FreshRSS or osmos::feed better?
Neither is universally better. FreshRSS has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are FreshRSS and osmos::feed free and open-source?
Yes. FreshRSS is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and osmos::feed under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FreshRSS and osmos::feed with Docker?
FreshRSS: yes. osmos::feed: check the project docs for container support.