FreshRSS vs Fusion
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FreshRSS
Free, self-hostable RSS feed aggregator
VS
Fusion
Lightweight self-hosted RSS reader with full-text fetch
| Feature | FreshRSS | Fusion |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,716 | ★ 2,149 |
| First released | 2013 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Inoreader, Google Reader | Feedly, Inoreader |
Why pick each one
Choose FreshRSS if…
- Lightweight and fast
- Works with many mobile apps
- Actively maintained
Choose Fusion if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.1k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is FreshRSS or Fusion better?
Neither is universally better. FreshRSS has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are FreshRSS and Fusion free and open-source?
Yes. FreshRSS is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Fusion under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FreshRSS and Fusion with Docker?
FreshRSS: yes. Fusion: yes.