Fusion vs osmos::feed
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Fusion | osmos::feed |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 86 · Excellent | 14 · At risk |
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,182 | ★ 989 |
| First released | 2024 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Inoreader | Feedly |
What are Fusion and osmos::feed?
Fusion
Fusion is a lightweight, self-hosting-friendly RSS reader with a fast reading workflow, unread tracking, bookmarks, and full-text search. It can extract full article content and deploys as a single binary or Docker container.
- Full-text article extraction
- Unread tracking and bookmarks
- Built-in search
- Single-binary or Docker
osmos::feed
osmos::feed is a tool that turns a list of feeds into a self-hosted static RSS reader website using GitHub Actions. It requires no server and rebuilds the reader on a schedule.
- Static site RSS reader
- Runs on GitHub Actions
- No server required
Fusion vs osmos::feed: key differences
Both projects are written in TypeScript. Osmos::feed is the lighter option, starting around 32 MB of RAM against 128 MB for Fusion. Osmos::feed is the more established project (first released 2021), while Fusion arrived in 2024. Fusion has the considerably larger community, at 2,182 GitHub stars versus 989. Fusion lists first-class Docker deployment; osmos::feed does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Fusion if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
Choose osmos::feed if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Fusion or osmos::feed better?
Neither is universally better. Fusion has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Fusion and osmos::feed free and open-source?
Yes. Fusion is licensed under MIT and osmos::feed under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Fusion and osmos::feed with Docker?
Fusion: yes. osmos::feed: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, Fusion or osmos::feed?
osmos::feed has the smaller minimum footprint at 32 MB of RAM, compared to about 128 MB for Fusion. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.