Feeder vs osmos::feed
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Feeder | osmos::feed |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Read-the-docs project | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 87 · Excellent | 14 · At risk |
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Kotlin | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | binary | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,045 | ★ 989 |
| First released | 2015 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Feedly | Feedly |
What are Feeder and osmos::feed?
Feeder
Feeder is an open-source, lightweight RSS and Atom feed reader for Android that works fully offline. It can also synchronize with self-hosted backends and import OPML feed lists.
- Fully offline Android reader
- OPML import and export
- Optional backend sync
osmos::feed
osmos::feed is a tool that turns a list of feeds into a self-hosted static RSS reader website using GitHub Actions. It requires no server and rebuilds the reader on a schedule.
- Static site RSS reader
- Runs on GitHub Actions
- No server required
Feeder vs osmos::feed: key differences
Feeder is written in Kotlin, while osmos::feed is built with TypeScript. Licensing differs — GPL-3.0 for Feeder versus MIT for osmos::feed. Osmos::feed is the lighter option, starting around 32 MB of RAM against 64 MB for Feeder. Feeder is the more established project (first released 2015), while osmos::feed arrived in 2021. Feeder has the considerably larger community, at 3,045 GitHub stars versus 989.
Why pick each one
Choose Feeder if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Kotlin
Choose osmos::feed if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Feeder or osmos::feed better?
Neither is universally better. Feeder has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Feeder and osmos::feed free and open-source?
Yes. Feeder is licensed under GPL-3.0 and osmos::feed under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Feeder and osmos::feed with Docker?
Feeder: check the project docs for container support. osmos::feed: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, Feeder or osmos::feed?
osmos::feed has the smaller minimum footprint at 32 MB of RAM, compared to about 64 MB for Feeder. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.